If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although https://ctxt.io/2/AACQcydkEA 're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. https://fingerflare24.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/26/very-best-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-system/ is also the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.